Friday, February 10, 2017
Is Siege Necessary?
I think that siege in total war is not necessary. The reason why I think that is because civilians that live there, don't need to go through that pain. There were thousands of people on the ground waiting for a doctor to come to them. There were only so many doctors, and they had to wait in the hot sun with no water or food while being sick. The North invaded the South and took all their food and necessary things, then they burned down their house. The Southerners then had to walk with no food or water to get to Virginia after all of the disaster happened. This is the reason why I think the Northerners didn't have to do all of this damage to the South and the people living there.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with your opinion because it isn't neccassary
ReplyDeleteI understand your opinion and I like how you went into detail and added examples to support your claim
ReplyDeleteI respectfully disagree because the war would have not ended as soon as it did if they did not use siege and total war
ReplyDeleteI agree with you. I like all of the reasons you gave too.
ReplyDelete