Friday, February 10, 2017

Total war and siege

I think that total war and siege was not necessary. I think that because it sounds so harsh. People not having any food or not having a house. If you lived in a war area and you had to eat rats and horses what would you think. I would not be happy. If you were used to eating nice food and you lived in a nice house I wouldn't want to live in a cave eating rats. Especially when it is total war because then you don't know what will happen will you run out of food water. You also wouldn't know what was going on because you would be hiding. I think that siege and total war was not necessary.
Posted by at

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:12 AM

    I agree, I wouldn't want to be living in a time where people would have to eat rats. Good gob at giving examples.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:15 AM

    I agree with it being very harsh, although I disagree with your opinion because everyone wanted the war to be over and with siege and total war, the civil war would be one step closer to ending

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:16 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:18 AM

    I respectfully disagree but you did give good evidence to your reasons.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 9:20 AM

    I actually agree with your post, at first I read you blog wrong.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)